Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BRAYBOY v. PAGANO et al
as 2:2024cv05259
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
LEONARD TENAGLIA and GEORGE A. PAGANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, JUDGE GEORGE A. PAGANO, PROSECUTOR DIANE HORN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PECORARI et al v. AKUMIN INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
PAUL A PECORARI and JOSEPH A PAGANO
Defendant:
AKUMIN INC., AKUMIN CORP. and ELITE IMAGING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WINSLOW et al v. BARKING DOGS FOOT & ANKLE CARE, P.C. et al
as 2:2022cv04395
Plaintiff:
DORIS WINSLOW and RICHARD WINSLOW
Defendant:
BARKING DOGS FOOT & ANKLE CARE, P.C., RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES II, P.C. doing business as THE ROTHMAN INSTITUTE, JEFFRY RUBIN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
BRAYBOY v. PAGANO et al
as 2:2021cv04247
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
GEORGE A. PAGANO and OFFICE DAUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
DEERE & COMPANY v. HOLLAND LAWN MOWER et al
as 2:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
DEERE & COMPANY
Defendant:
HOLLAND LAWN MOWER and ANTHONY PAGANO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PAGANO v. RAVEN SERVICES, JV, LLC
as 5:2019cv03160
Defendant:
RAVEN SERVICES, JV, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAGANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PAGANO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01065
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ALBERT PAGANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
