Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HINTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv07459
Plaintiff:
DESHANTA HINTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RONNIE R. HOLT, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HOLT v. O'NEILL et al
as 2:2012cv05665
Plaintiff:
BERTIL R. HOLT
Defendant:
JAMES O'BRIEN , CHARLES MERSSIER, THEODORE J. VIARBENTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HOLT
as 2:2011cv01808
Respondent:
RONNIE R. HOLT
Petitioner:
HOWARD L. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLT et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv79801
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. HOLT and BETTYE JEAN HOLT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOLT et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv79800
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. HOLT and BETTYE JEAN HOLT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOLT v. BAIBORI et al
as 2:2009cv01807
Plaintiff:
BERTIL R. HOLT
Defendant:
FRANK BAIBORI and THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MILHOUSE v. HOLT
as 2:2009mc00020
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILHOUSE
Defendant:
RONNIE R. HOLT
Cause Of Action: Local Question
HOLT et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89839
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE R. HOLT, ARCHIE R. HOLT, EDNA M. HOLT and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOORE v. HOLT et al
as 2:2008cv00159
Petitioner:
CECIL A. MOORE
Respondent:
RONNIE R. HOLT, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, MR. WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JENNINGS v. HOLT et al
as 2:2007cv03852
Petitioner:
GABRIEL JENNINGS
Respondent:
RONNIE R. HOLT and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
