Cases 1 - 10 of 57
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 2:2023cv03413
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GIULIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAVERAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv06163
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
RUDY TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JESIOLOWSKI v. GENSIS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv00742
Plaintiff:
TONI A. JESIOLOWSKI
Defendant:
GENSIS MAINTENANCE CORPORATION , THOMAS P. BEVACQUA and RUDY VALENTINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCUTCHEN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
RUDY DALE MCCUTCHEN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKINS v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Defendant:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALDRED H. EASTLACK, RUDLOPH RUDY HEIERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAKOFF v. ST. CLAIR, CPAS, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv07222
Plaintiff:
MARTIN D. RAKOFF
Defendant:
ST. CLAIR, CPAS, P.C. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cross_claimant:
JEFFREY HARRISON, CPA
Cross_defendant:
MICHAEL P. RUDY, CPA & ASSOCIATES , MICHAEL P. RUDY, CPA and ST. CLAIR, CPAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSENBERG v. BOGUSKI et al
as 5:2013cv06355
Plaintiff:
RUDY ROSENBERG
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEONARD BOGUSKI , ROBERT MORRIS MCALAINE , PAUL ROBERT BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ANDERSON v. SOUSA et al
as 2:2013cv06038
Plaintiff:
RUDI ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOSE R. SOUSA and CHRISTOPHER J. MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
