Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC v. PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03728
Plaintiff:
NELSON WORLDWIDE, LLC
Defendant:
PINBAR ARCHITECTURE, LLC, ROBERT WILSON AUSDENMOORE and ROBERT ANTHONY RINK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RINK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv05328
Plaintiff:
HASON RINK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RINK
as 2:2017cv03810
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ASHISA RAIFA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER RINK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
MITCHELL v. OBRIEN et al
as 2:2016cv03556
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND OBRIEN, DENNIS LEIGHTON, KEITH M. BERTRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC v. RINK
as 2:2015cv06328
Plaintiff:
LEAF CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
DOUGLAS RINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FLINT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65369
Plaintiff:
MARK A FLINT and DENISE RINKES FLINT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RINKE et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62439
Plaintiff:
BENNY RINKE and DOROTHY RINKE
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RINKE v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv89767
Plaintiff:
BENNY RINKE and DOROTHY RINKE
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
