Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KOCHMER et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRANCIS JAY KOCHMER, JR., CONNOR ROBERT MERLINO-BARTON, RAYMOND DUHAIME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
STONE v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2018cv01705
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN STONE
Defendant:
FRANCES W. THOMAS and FRANCINE THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 2:2017cv01482
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN A. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. TEAMCARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv03961
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TEAMCARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC , JESSICA SHENK, ERIN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PLONKA v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2013cv03069
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE A. PLONKA
Defendant:
MARY P. WEAVER, THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF SESUQUHANNA BORO, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SMITH v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
as 2:2011cv07684
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DEANS v. KENNEDY HOUSE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07125
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DEANS
Defendant:
KENNEDY HOUSE, INC., SEIU LOCAL BJ, CTW-CLC, THOMAS SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61157
Plaintiff:
JACK THOMAS SMITH and WILLA SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , GAF CORPORATION , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
