Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHN et al v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL VAUGHN and CAROLYN VAUGHN
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. and MARVIN BRINKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Singh v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Cameron T Vaughn and Seth V Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Singh v. Vaughn
as 2:2023cv03415
Plaintiff:
Gagandeep Singh
Defendant:
Seth V Vaughn and Cameron T Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
JOHNSON v. DONALD VAUGHN
as 2:2023cv00821
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent:
SUPER DONALD VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSTICK et al v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
LAGALE BROWN ROSTICK, VAUGHN SOUTH and ALANNA CUNEO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES and VARIOUS AGENCIES TO INCLUDE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHN v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA)
as 2:2022cv03615
Plaintiff:
JAMES V. VAUGHN
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
VAUGHN v. PNC BANK
as 2:2022cv03815
Plaintiff:
JAMES V VAUGHN
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
