Cases 1 - 10 of 89
LAWLER v. STANCIL et al
as 2:2022cv03801
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAWLER
Defendant:
KYLE STANCIL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
COBB et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02924
Plaintiff:
DIONNE COBB and ANTHONY LAWLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
BUTLER v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2018cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANDRE D. BUTLER
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and STACEY A. LAWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWLER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv02932
Plaintiff:
DONNA LAWLER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05563
Plaintiff:
GARY WILSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SANDRA K. KNEEDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. HOGELAND et al
as 2:2012cv03347
Plaintiff:
NOBLE J. CORBIN-BEY
Defendant:
H. WARREN HOGELAND, PHILADELPHIA TRAFFIC COURT, BOOT AND TOW DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LAWLER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67233
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. LAWLER and LORITA J. LAWLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LAWLER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42536
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. LAWLER and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RICHARDSON v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv04445
Petitioner:
JAMES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
