Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GRIFFIN v. PINKERMAN et al
as 2:2022cv04738
Plaintiff:
MARIPAT GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JOHN B PINKERMAN, MCLEOD EXPRESS LLC, LORETTA J MOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BECK v. LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv02909
Defendant:
GOOD SHEPERD REHABILITATION, LEHIGH COUNTY, JOHN DOE COMPANIES (1-10) FICTITIOUS DESIGNATION REPRESENTING THE AS YET UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL (S), PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS, AND/OR OTHER BUSINESS ENTITIES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04495
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL POLICE OFFICERS, UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL SHERIFFS DEPUTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAMZIDDIN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv07232
Plaintiff:
ABUSSAMAA RASUL RAMZIDDIN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER PHILADELPHIA, THE KINTOCK GROUP HALFWAY HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JACKSON v. VALLEY TOWNSHIP BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2011cv05579
Plaintiff:
JAMES LYBAND JACKSON
Defendant:
VALLEY TOWNSHIP BUREAU OF POLICE, TIMOTHY PARKER, TODD SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILSON v. THE LAW OFFICE(S) OF JACK MCMAHON JR., ESQ. AND MARY MARAN, ESQ. et al
as 2:2010cv03822
Plaintiff:
KEN WILSON
Defendant:
THE LAW OFFICE(S) OF JACK MCMAHON JR., ESQ. AND MARY MARAN, ESQ. and ONE TO FIFTY UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISHKHANIAN v. THE LAW OFFICE(S) OF JACK MCMAHON JR. ESQ. et al
as 2:2010cv03629
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ISHKHANIAN
Defendant:
THE LAW OFFICE(S) OF JACK MCMAHON JR. ESQ. and ONE TO FIFTY UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
