Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Clervrain et al v. Fetterman et al
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Lormil Woodny and others
Defendant:
John Fetterman, Elena Cross, Will Danowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Oliver et al
as 3:2021cv02039
Plaintiff:
David Torres
Defendant:
Jason Oliver, Sean Haggarty, Christopher Burnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
H o/b/o Harry Hamilton et al v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Amanda Ackley, Pennsylvania State University Athletics Department, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Harry E. Hamilton and H o/b/o Harry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feno v. Oliver et al
as 3:2020cv02242
Defendant:
Tyler O'Shura and Joshua Oliver
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Feno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Sanzi et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Nathan V. Oliver, Gary B. Sanzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrio Martin Wazar Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marte v. Oliver et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Kyle Oliver and The Borough of Jim Thorpe
Plaintiff:
Arturo Jonas Joaquin Marte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheffer v. Centre County et al
as 4:2018cv02080
Defendant:
Pamela A. Ruest, Brian K. Marshall, Thomas Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Sheffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
