Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tornillo v. Preferred Management Associates et al
as 3:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Michael Tornillo
Defendant:
Preferred Management Associates and Thornhurst County Club Estates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Foland v. The Commenwealth of Pennslyvania et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Edward Foland
Defendant:
The Commenwealth of Pennslyvania, The Monaca Borough Police Department, The Pennslyvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Estate of Edward L. Himmelwright v. Brungard et al
as 4:2021cv01731
Plaintiff:
Estate of Edward L. Himmelwright
Defendant:
Bobbie Jo Brungard, Dr. James Sweetland, UPMC Lock Haven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Loftus Adjustment Company et al
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Jherion Levesque, Doe 1, Frank Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kane et al v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2019cv01544
Defendant:
Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kane, Estate of Sarah Elizabeth Quinn and Michael E. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
