Cases 11 - 20 of 958
Reed v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyahla, Sr. v. Youngkin, Sr. et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Tyahla, Sr.
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Sr., Derrick George, John Gablick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. F.C.I. Schuylkill et al
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Andrews, III
Defendant:
F.C.I. Schuylkill and Warden Beth Rickard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramer III v. Warden of Columbia County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Petitioner:
Randy Andrew Ramer III
Respondent:
Warden of Columbia County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dewald v. Hollenbaugh et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Respondent:
Ken Hollenbaugh and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bieri v. Saul
as 3:2023cv01919
Plaintiff:
David Bieri
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. USA
as 1:2023cv01901
Petitioner:
Wyatt Andrew Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
