Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Banks v. Sproat et al
as 1:2013cv01752
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Jim Sproat, Carol Turlac, Realty Counseling Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Halke et al
as 1:2013cv01165
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Halke, T. Parke, Charles Samuels and others
Fifth_party_defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
M. Pugh, CCA (Corrections Corporation of America), Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Funk v. Obama
as 3:2012cv01830
Plaintiff:
Charles Reuben Funk
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
as 3:2012cv01164
Petitioner:
Donald D. Jennings
Respondent:
Barack Obama, United States Of America, Thomas Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pavalone v. Bush et al
as 3:2011cv01620
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack Obama, William Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pavalone v. Bush et al
as 1:2011cv01620
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack Obama, William Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Sutierland et al
as 1:2011cv01551
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damion Black
Defendant:
AW Sutierland, Donahue, Donna Zicketoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Foiera et al
as 1:2011cv01209
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Respondent:
Thomas Foiera, Donna Zickefoose, CO Food Service Hemmingway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
