Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Ellis v. Stanzik et al
as 1:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Ellis
Defendant:
Stanzik , Ms. Delbaso , Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamgotchai, et al v. State Horse Racing Commission et al
as 1:2016cv02035
Defendant:
State Horse Racing Commission, Thomas Chuckas, Jr. , Russell C. Redding and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jamgotchian and Eric Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Abrams , James W. Alexander , James F. Allen and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Christian v. Green et al
as 3:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Michael Green, James Ellis, Cindy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Darla C. Ellis
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01077
Plaintiff:
Kristie Lynne Ellis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bolus et al v. Carnicella, Esquire et al
as 4:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Bolus , Karen Bolus and Preston Bolus
Defendant:
Amy Carnicella, Esquire , Robert B. Stewart, III, Esquire , Richard M. Bosco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Cindy S. Johnson, James Ellis, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Social Security
as 4:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Scott Ellis
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 3:2013cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
