Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Hammond v. Baltazar
as 3:2018cv01236
Petitioner:
Navarro A Hammond
Respondent:
J. Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hammonds v. Luzerne County Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv02264
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Luzerne County Division of Corrections , Warden Larson , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2016cv02204
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Trooper John Doe, Luzerne County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. USA
as 1:2015cv02116
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Damien Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hammonds v. PA Dept. of Corr. et al
as 4:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corr., John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Sexton et al
as 3:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
Piper Ware
Defendant:
Ashley Sexton , Teresa Hammond and Arden Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammonds v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2013cv02322
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hammond
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre and Thomas M. Leighton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammonds v. The Religious Accomodaion Committee at Camp Hill et al
as 4:2013cv01470
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
The Religious Accomodaion Committee at Camp Hill, Frank Lewis, Stephen Buzas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael Hammond
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, Rear, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
