Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Syster v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
James Syster
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard and Medical Staff at SCI-Camp Hill, names unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roulhac v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Paul Khalifah Roulhac
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breeland v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv01937
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Robert B. MacIntyre, L.S. Kerns-Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Breeland, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Luzerne County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2011cv01699
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Stanley
Defendant:
Luzerne County District Attorney's Office , Jacqueline M. Carroll , David Pedri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Beard et al
as 1:2011cv00863
Plaintiff:
Israel Torres
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael Klopotoski, Vincent Kopec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lorady et al
as 3:2011cv00666
Plaintiff:
Matt Jones
Defendant:
Lorady, Michael Wenerowicz, Kovalchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messersmith v. Iannuzzi et al
as 3:2011cv00420
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Messersmith
Defendant:
Tony Iannuzzi, Marva Cerullo, John Kerestes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adee v. Beard et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
James W. Adee
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Richard Ellers, Kathryn McCarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al.
as 3:2010cv02597
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Health, Drug and Alcohol programs, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Catherine McVey and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hallman v. Stitt et al
as 1:2010cv02531
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wesley Hallman
Defendant:
Robert Stitt, Jeffrey Beard, Raymond Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
