Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Doe
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Antoine DeWayne Walker
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sampson v. Carrita et al
as 4:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Earl Sampson
Defendant:
1-10 John/Jane Doe, OFFICER NICHOLAS CARRITA, OFFICER RICHARD HOFFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. Gimble et al
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Joshua Payne
Defendant:
R. Gimble, S. Nicholson and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Conners et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Ian Conners, Scott Finley, Ellen Mace Leibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carey v. State Trooper Robert Gayewski, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Maliq Carey
Defendant:
State Trooper Robert Gayewski, Jr., State Trooper Derek Leib and 1-6 John/Jane Doe State Troopers/Police Officers,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Severino-Mota v. Lidwell et al
as 3:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Ranyell Severino-Mota
Defendant:
Alexa Lidwell, John/Jane Doe(s), Dr. Malhi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2022cv01999
Plaintiff:
Denise Nixon
Defendant:
Wendy Nicholas, William Frantz, John/Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Herrera
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Joan Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.