Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall vs. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv02126
Plaintiff:
Lynn L. Marshall, Jr.
Amicus Curiae:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lawrence v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv02007
Petitioner:
Derrick Lawrence
Respondent:
United States of America, Immigration and Naturalization Services, United States Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Ransom et al
as 3:2021cv01554
Petitioner:
Dwight Marshall
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. U.S. Marshals Judiciary Security Division et al
as 1:2021cv00890
Respondent:
New York Times, U.S. Department of Justice, Fox News and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
H o/b/o Harry Hamilton et al v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Amanda Ackley, Pennsylvania State University Athletics Department, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Harry E. Hamilton and H o/b/o Harry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00229
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cienciva v. Brozowski et al
as 3:2020cv02045
Defendant:
John Doe United States Marshals and Josepha M. Brozowski
Plaintiff:
Peter Cienciva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cupp, et al v. County of Lycoming et al
as 3:2020cv01784
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Jennifer Mull, Christopher J. Ebner and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
