Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Murphy v. Berdanier et al
as 1:2009cv01127
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy
Defendant:
Gene Berdanier, Dave Wapinsky, Michael Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Lupert et al
as 3:2009cv00789
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mitchell
Defendant:
Renee Lupert, C. Wright, Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eline v. Judicial District of Schuylkill County et al
as 3:2008cv02117
Plaintiff:
Paul Eline
Defendant:
Judicial District of Schuylkill County, James P. Goodman, Frank R. Cori and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Victor v. SCI Smithfield et al
as 3:2008cv01374
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
SCI Smithfield, R.M. Lawler, Warden, SCI Huntington and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gregory G. Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, R. M. Lawer, Connie Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BEATTIE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI MAHANOY et al
as 1:2008cv00622
Plaintiff:
Antonio S. Beattie
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Edward Klem, Barbara Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodman v. Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
as 1:2008cv00115
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Goodman
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Penn v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2007cv02135
Petitioner:
Aaron Penn
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Thomas J. Pellish, Robert S. Betnar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, Kenneth Chmielewski, T. Temperine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
