Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Ruiz v. Sneizeck et al
as 1:2010cv02645
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruiz
Defendant:
T.R. Sneizeck, Eileen Falzini, John D. Mannetti, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Groff v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv02340
Plaintiff:
Elsworth Leroy Groff, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Dawn Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Sneizeck et al
as 1:2010cv01664
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruiz
Defendant:
T.R. Sneizeck, Eileen Falzini, John D. Mannetti, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeArment v. Sacavage et al
as 3:2010cv01360
Plaintiff:
Michael W. DeArment
Defendant:
Robert B. Sacavage, Sheriff's Department Northumberland County, John D Wondolski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ward v. Bledsoe
as 3:2010cv00294
Petitioner:
John D Ward
Respondent:
Warden Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ashford v. Brady et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winston Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Brady, John D. Brenneman, Leas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paluch v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
James A. Paluch, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, John S. Shaffer, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Shannon et al
as 3:2008cv02145
Petitioner:
John D. Wilson
Respondent:
Robert Shannon, ., Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Singer v. Bowman et al
as 1:2008cv01999
Plaintiff:
James M. Singer
Defendant:
Andrea Bowman, Esq., Ruth Dunnewold, Esq., Albert Masland, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
