Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Ring v. Luther et al
as 3:2015cv00458
Petitioner:
Mark Ring
Respondent:
Jamey P. Luther and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardison v. Mooney et al
as 3:2015cv00439
Petitioner:
James Hardison
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney, Kathleen Kane and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barksdale v. Mahally et al
as 3:2015cv00173
Petitioner:
Randolph Barksdale
Respondent:
Lawrence P Mahally, Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Harry et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Petitioner:
Jose Ruiz
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, Thomas Kearney and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bibbs v. Gilmore et al
as 1:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Charles Bibbs
Respondent:
Robert Gilmore and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Prison Legal News et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News , Daniel Denvir , Philadelphia City Paper and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Amicu:
Amy B Ginensky and Eli M. Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. GILMORE et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Petitioner:
Alexander L. Garcia
Respondent:
Robert D. Gilmore , Kathleen Kane , The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamal et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2014cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mumia Abu Jamal , Robert L. Holbrook , Human Rights Coalition and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Loungo et al
as 3:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
William L. Burrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Loungo, Richard Gladdys, Ed Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Fergeson et al
as 1:2014cv01822
Petitioner:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Respondent:
Fergeson, PA State Attorney General, James B. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
