Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Martinez
as 3:2009cv02037
Petitioner:
Leonidas R. Fields
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00736
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00404
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00184
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02198
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bell et al v. The City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2008cv01563
Plaintiff:
Kate Bell , Kathy Bacon , Jennifer Bryson and others
Defendant:
The City of Harrisburg , Charles Kellar , Tina Manoogian-King and others
Movant:
Robert Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. The City of Harrisburg et al
as 3:2008cv01563
Plaintiff:
Kate Bell, Kate Bell, Kate Bell and others
Defendant:
The City of Harrisburg, Charles Kellar, Stephen Reed and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fields v. FCI Allenwood Pa et al
as 3:2008cv00662
Plaintiff:
Donald Lynn Fields
Defendant:
FCI Allenwood Pa, PA. Pawanda/Dr. Laino and Dr. Pigos
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ponta-Garcia v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00129
Respondent:
Secretary Michael Chertoff, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Renato Ponta-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
