Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Henderson v. Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Banks v. Williams et al
as 1:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Williams, Lt., Henderson, US Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bledsoe
as 3:2010cv00368
Petitioner:
Eric Henderson
Respondent:
B. A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson et al v. Capital Management Services, LP
as 1:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson and Marie Henderson
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HENDERSON v. KEISLING et al
as 3:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
David E. Henderson
Defendant:
Kenneth Keisling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rivera et al v. Snavely et al
as 1:2009cv02243
Plaintiff:
Digna Rivera and Roberto Torres
Defendant:
Kevin Snavely, Bithia Rissinger, Keith Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01615
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson and Marie Henderson
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henderson v. USA
as 1:2009cv00614
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Valentino Henderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Murray v. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
Glenn Asa Murray
Defendant:
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Dick Shellenberger, Molly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Winstead et al
as 3:2008cv01920
Plaintiff:
Bernadette V. White
Defendant:
Rhoda Winstead and Michelle Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
