Cases 41 - 50 of 168
MELENDEZ v. YORK COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00848
Defendant:
Travis Martin, York County Pennsylvania State Police Department and John/Jane Doe State Police Trooper
Plaintiff:
Wilberto Melendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosen v. Palmer et al
as 3:2021cv00791
Defendant:
Trooper Sharon Palmer, John/Jane Doe and Colonel Robert Evanchik
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Crosen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
T.D.H. v. Dauphin County et al
as 3:2021cv00771
Defendant:
Dauphin County, Dauphin County Judicial Center Central Booking Facility and John/Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
T.D.H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
David B. Rossman
Defendant:
The County of Centre, Alesha Weaver, PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Auker et al
as 1:2021cv00655
Defendant:
Mr. W.T. Auker and John/Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
John Antonio Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garanin v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2021cv00644
Defendant:
Louis DeNaples, Thomas Staff, Lackawanna Recycling Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Vsevolod Garanin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMIDT v. LEIGHTON STATE POLICE BARRACKS et al
as 3:2021cv00317
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Leighton State Trooper, Carbon County Sherrif Dept., Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bartol et al v. Arbogast et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Katherine Bartol
Defendant:
Dauphin County, John/Jane Does 1 - 10 and Pamela Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Wellpath, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and John/Jane Doe(S)
Plaintiff:
Parris Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Havens et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rocellus Carter, Libby Williams and C.W.
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Havens and Officers John/Jane Doe #1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
