Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Simmons v. Varand et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Petitioner:
Johnnie Simmons
Respondent:
David Varand and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Barone et al
as 4:2009cv01686
Petitioner:
Akeem R Simmons
Respondent:
Michael Barone and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nestrick v. Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Simmons Rockwell, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01630
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nestrick
Defendant:
Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Simmons Rockwell, Inc. and The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Simmons v. Yost et al
as 3:2008cv02325
Plaintiff:
Alan Simmons
Defendant:
John Yost, John Dodrill, Mark Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simmons v. PA Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Richard Simmons
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. USA
as 1:2008cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cedric D. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Heilman v. T.W. Ponessa and Assoc. et al
as 4:2007cv01308
Plaintiff:
Craig Heilman
Defendant:
T.W. Ponessa and Assoc., Molly Simmon, Kim McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
