Cases 71 - 80 of 120
Brett v. U.S. Marshal Steve et al
as 1:2013cv02597
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Steve, U.S. Marshal Dave and Robert Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Warden
as 3:2013cv02223
Petitioner:
Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duke v. Gavin et al
as 4:2013cv01969
Petitioner:
Marshall Elwood Duke
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peace v. Saul Ewing, LLP et al
as 1:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Gretchen J. Peace
Defendant:
Saul Ewing, LLP, Marshall B. Paul and Kurt L. Ehresman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Edwards Business Machines v. Marshall
as 4:2013cv00702
Plaintiff:
Edwards Business Machines
Defendant:
William Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv02441
Petitioner:
Johnnie Williams
Respondent:
United States of America , McCreary , U S Marshall Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brett v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 1:2012cv01495
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls, Phila Cops Officer Carey and Jonas and Unknown PA. State Police Car
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Reiley
as 3:2012cv01163
Plaintiff:
Demarco Marshall
Defendant:
Edward F. Reiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguilar v. Pacific Orthopedic Medical Group et al
as 4:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ramon Aguilar
Defendant:
Pacific Orthopedic Medical Group, Clement Alade, P.R. Chandrasekaran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
