Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Wright v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wright v. Colon
as 4:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Melissa Colon and Eugene Eiden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Dwayne Wright
Respondent:
John Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Wright v. Sage
as 3:2023cv01973
Petitioner:
Chay Wright
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Johnson & Wales University
as 3:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Johnson & Wales University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Leppien v. Harry et al
as 3:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leppien
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, M. Gourley, A. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Wright v. Rivello et al
as 1:2023cv01553
Petitioner:
Dwayne Wright
Respondent:
John Rivello and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. EBY, LLC
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Wright
Defendant:
Eby, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
