Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Proctor v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Proctor
Defendant:
Dr. Jacqueline Howard, PA Taylor Talasky, CRNP Tiffany Sottile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. McIntyre et al
as 1:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Kapri Drayton
Defendant:
Amanda McIntyre, D. Horan, LT. Barrat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Howell et al
as 1:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
Leeanne Evans
Defendant:
Howard Howell and 3M Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. USA
as 4:2023cv01217
Petitioner:
Raymond Howard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. Bymes et al
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Howard Bruce Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Bymes and Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Michaud v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Superintendent Gina Clark and Sergeant King-Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
