Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs, III v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvette Kane, C. Darnell Jones, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bacon v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dwane Bacon
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Luzerne County Correctional Facility, Deborah Schloss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kane et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Kevin John Kane and Sean Michael Kane
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kane v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M. Kane
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. ISS Management, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
ISS Management, LLC, Infrastructure Solution Services, Inc., H20 Infrastructure LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
