Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Frederick Thomas, Michael D. Spriggs, Michael Green and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene et al v. Bradley et al
as 4:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Officer Barrett, Officer Bond and E. Bradley
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene and David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greene v. Bradley et al
as 4:2021cv00024
Defendant:
United States of America, OFC. S. Forney, OFC A. McCune and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00968
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Greene v. Warden
as 4:2019cv00376
Petitioner:
Michael Greene
Respondent:
Warden and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greene v. Warden et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Petitioner:
Michael Greene
Respondent:
Warden and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Green et al
as 3:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
Michael Green, James Ellis, Cindy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
