Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Burton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2016cv01953
Plaintiff:
Niara Burton
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Brenda Tritt , Trevor Winguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Randy Knox
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Michael Harlow, Mark Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Harlow et al
as 3:2013cv02086
Petitioner:
Louis William Roach
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morningwake v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01698
Petitioner:
Dwayne Morningwake
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morningwake v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01668
Petitioner:
Dwayne Morningwake
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Harlow
as 3:2013cv00653
Petitioner:
Colton Andrew Barrett
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinones v. Harlow et al
as 1:2013cv00170
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rivera Quinones
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Harlow
as 1:2012cv02230
Petitioner:
Samuel Lee Martin
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kemper v. Harlow et al
as 1:2012cv02022
Petitioner:
Douglas Kemper
Respondent:
Michael Harlow , PA Attorney General and York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
XAVIER v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2012cv01603
Petitioner:
Gustavo Xavier
Respondent:
Michael Harlow and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
