Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rollins v. Edrehi et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Sandra Rollins
Defendant:
Clark Edrehi, Mary Swenson, William Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tucker v. Rollins
as 4:2017cv01889
Plaintiff:
Kathy F. Tucker
Defendant:
Timothy J. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Molcon v. Graterford Prison et al
as 4:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
Michael Molcon
Defendant:
Graterford Prison, Natal, Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollins v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2015cv01491
Petitioner:
Trent Rollins
Respondent:
John Kerestes , Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronemus et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 1:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
Rollin Ronemus and Mary Jane Ronemus
Defendant:
Cumberland County and Corrinne Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Davenport et al
as 3:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Johnson and Janelle Rollins
Defendant:
Beth Davenport and Victoria L. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. O'Donnell et al
as 3:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Trent Rollins
Defendant:
O'Donnell, D. Bunner and John Kerestes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2009cv02064
Plaintiff:
Rollin Michael Barber, Paula Lappe-Barber, Rachel Lappe-Biler and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement, Bradley D. Shields, Bruce Minick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Appointment of Counsel - Petty offenses
as 3:2009mc00063
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Myron Shilo, Peter Spellman, Richard Sherwood and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
