Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royster v. Glunt et al
as 3:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Royster
Defendant:
Glunt, William T. Williams, Burk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al
as 3:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DION BROOKING
Defendant:
D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL, Zobitne, Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy-Gibson v. Hubber et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCoy-Gibson
Defendant:
A. Hubber, B. McBeth, Cleaveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viera v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv02424
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Viera
Defendant:
William T. Williams, John T. Symons, Christina Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercaldo v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv01139
Plaintiff:
Richard Mercaldo
Defendant:
J. Wetzel, J. Barnacle, J. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saltalamacchia v. Wentzel et al
as 3:2012cv01902
Plaintiff:
Anthony Saltalamacchia
Defendant:
John Wentzel, Marirosa Lamas, Jeffrey Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Gould, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Marirosa Lamas, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Cruz v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv01302
Defendant:
Ted Williams, Jeffery Rackovan, Doctor Symons and others
Plaintiff:
Kristan Diaz-Cruz
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Kustoff et al
as 3:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
David Kustoff, Edward L Stanton, III, State of Tennessee and others
Amicu:
Shelby Count Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
