Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Conover v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00826
Petitioner:
Gerrett Conover
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Warden Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rinick v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv02165
Petitioner:
William Rinick
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and PA. D.O.C. Secretary Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tensley v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Petitioner:
Darian Renard Tensley
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons , U.S.P. Allenwood , Oddo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2015cv01394
Plaintiff:
Aaron Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, R. A. PURDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. Frantz et al
as 3:2011cv00593
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hunter
Defendant:
Cory Frantz and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McIvor v. Scism et al
as 3:2011cv00489
Petitioner:
Donald McIvor
Respondent:
William A. Scism and U.S. Bureau of Prisons Designation and Sentence Computation Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pettus v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
Nakia Pettus
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2008cv01417
Plaintiff:
Bernard Green
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stevens v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv00620
Petitioner:
John Edward Stevens
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and R. Martinez
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
