Cases 1 - 10 of 10
VILLA et al v. CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
as 3:2022cv01321
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Villa and Susan Davidson
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00133
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Villa-Garcia v. Pigos et al
as 1:2014cv01118
Plaintiff:
Francisco Villa-Garcia
Defendant:
Kevin Pigos and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villa-Garcia v. Pigos et al
as 1:2014cv01094
Plaintiff:
Francisco Villa-Garcia
Defendant:
Kevin Pigos and John Doe (s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. The Villas at Tree Tops & Fairway et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Amanda Garcia
Defendant:
The Villas at Tree Tops & Fairway , The Villas At Tree Tops , Bushkill Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01952
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Christ the King Manor, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2009cv02007
Plaintiff:
Christ the King Manor, Inc., Baldock Associates, Birchwood SNF, LLC and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Charlene Frizzera and Estelle B. Richman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Moelis et al v. Bushkill Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00923
Plaintiff:
Sharon Moelis and Larry Moelis
Defendant:
Bushkill Group, Inc., Resorts USA, Inc., The Villas at Fairways and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
