Cases 21 - 30 of 11,912
JIANG v. JOHSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
ZIYAO JIANG
Defendant:
JOHSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GREATER JOHNSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT and COYLE PROPERTIES LIMITED II LLC HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DEVLIEGER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
CARL L DEVLIEGER
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN and PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTOR v. GALICH et al
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CASTOR
Defendant:
OFFICER DUSTIN GALICH, OFFICER JARRET KASPRYSZYN, OFFICER JOSHUA STEGENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONONIE v. BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW et al
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
PAUL-ANTHONY CONONIE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST VIEW, MICHAEL BRUNNER, RICHARD G. OPIELA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
