Cases 51 - 58 of 58
SEEDS OF PEACE COLLECTIVE et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2009cv01275
Plaintiff:
SEEDS OF PEACE COLLECTIVE, SEEDS OF PEACE COLLECTIVE, SEEDS OF PEACE COLLECTIVE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, OFFICER SELLERS, OFFICER KURVACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv01093
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. MOORE, ESQ.
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY, JOHN R. WALTON, PAUL CARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRINE v. COLBURN'S AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. GRINE
Defendant:
COLBURN'S AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION, INC., STEPHEN E. SELLSTROM, ROBERT L. WOLFGANG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VACEK v. PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD et al
as 1:2008cv00221
Plaintiff:
DAN L. VACEK
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD, JOESPH A. MASSA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DICKSON v. COUNTY OF ERIE PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DICKSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE PENNSYLVANIA, MARK DiVECCO, JAMES VESHECCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
DOUGLASS v. PENN HILLS BOROUGH et al
as 2:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
TERESA E. DOUGLASS
Defendant:
PENN HILLS BOROUGH, OFFICER ANTHONY N. DIULUS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORETTI v. SEILHAMMER et al
as 2:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
HENRY C. MORETTI
Defendant:
TERRY SEILHAMMER, RONALD RABER, THOMAS DUBOVI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
NEWBY et al v. THE CITY OF DUQUESNE et al
as 2:2007cv00437
Plaintiff:
CHELSEA NEWBY and CHYNNA ELYCE NEWBY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF DUQUESNE, MUNICIPALITY #1, RICHARD ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
