Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ANTHONY v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ANTHONY
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS, PHILIP TREADWAY and SEAN GERCKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
ANGELL et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
KELLY ANGELL and DERONE LEWIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, OFFICER STEPHEN MESCAN, DETECTIVE JAMES MONKELIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. ALIQUIPPA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
THEAUGHN LEWIS
Defendant:
ALIQUIPPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRUCE TOOCH, PAUL WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
JACOB CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL LEWIS and TIMOTHY MORANDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
BOBBI J. SALAMON, HUNT, PROBURSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROTHERS v. PSP et al
as 2:2019cv01303
Defendant:
NESHANNOCK POLICE, TPR. SHAWN KING, TPR. ROMAN SHABLESKY and others
Plaintiff:
TIYONDA BROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FOGLE v. SOKOL et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JAMES FOGLE
Defendant:
JOHN SOKOL, MICHAEL STEFFEE, DONALD BECHWITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROADMAN v. SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
DONNA ROADMAN
Defendant:
SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL and RONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WAGNER v. CRAWFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAGNER
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY, CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF JAIL INSPECTIONS, FRANCIS J. SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
