Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DRAYTON v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv01606
Plaintiff:
FRANKLYN DRAYTON
Defendant:
D. EDWARDS, MS. CAMPOPIANO, MS. A. SHOWALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. WASHINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
SHELDON LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PBPP) and DANIEL RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. BOWLIN et al
as 2:2020cv01376
Defendant:
LT A.J. MORRIS, SECURITY OFFICE, CERT TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
SHAMONE WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREZIOSI v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv01163
Defendant:
ALAN MORRIS, CO JOHNSON, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. PREZIOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARREN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
SUSAN CONINE, DOUG YUHOUSE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01714
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, CART W. SHRADER, MINDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLEASON v. JONES et al
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. GLEASON, SR.
Defendant:
JONES , MORRIS and SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE V. MILLWARD, ET AL.
as 3:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
COLIN ROSE
Defendant:
M. MILLWARD, E. MORRIS, W. NOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHES v. DYKSTRA et al
as 2:2007cv01740
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
LENNY DYKSTRA, GARY SHEFFIELD, DAVID JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
