Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STOREY et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
SEAN STOREY , KEVIN JOHNSON and JEROME LYNCH
Defendant:
SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, JOHN E. WETZEL, MELVIN LOCKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOSEPH SLOMNICKI v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv01756
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , ERIC HOLMES , LUKE RAVENSTAHL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SLOMNICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MICHAELS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01729
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAELS , BRIAN OLINGER , HARRY NICOLETTI and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL , GARY HILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOR v. BURNS et al
as 2:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE J. DEMOR
Defendant:
DANIEL BURNS and ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURNS v. DICHTER et al
as 2:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. BURNS
Defendant:
HARRIET DICHTER and RAYMOND S. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LAWSON v. BURNS et al
as 2:2009cv01538
Plaintiff:
ALTON L. LAWSON
Defendant:
GARY BURNS, THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
