Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Z.H. v. PENN HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2012cv01696
Plaintiff:
Z.H. and MICHELLE BERISH
Defendant:
PENN HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT and SHAUN COOKE
Mediator:
JOEL PRETZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRADOS v. LANIER et al
as 2:2011cv00935
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. GRADOS
Defendant:
KAREN LANIER, LINDA WALT , WILLIAM BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
COOK v. EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
N. ELIZABETH COOK
Defendant:
EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS O. NELSON, KAHAN SABLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. THE ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al
as 2:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH COOK
Defendant:
THE ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG and GREENSBURG CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOK v. INDOVINA et al
as 2:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE L. COOK
Defendant:
PHIL INDOVINA, PHIL'S FLICKS & ASSOCIATES and LINDA COOK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
COOK v. NEW CASTLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COOK
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, GEORGE GABRIEL, FRED MOZZOCIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
