Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PITTSBURGH POLIC DEPARTMENT, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LUNCINSKI v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00237
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LUNCINSKI
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III, THOMAS E. BRANDON, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEMIANI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01724
Plaintiff:
LARBI SEMIANI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KORMANIK et al
as 3:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT KORMANIK and KINAMROK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA et al
as 2:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS et al
as 2:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRACTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKLIN v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
ALTON C. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, THOMAS E. BRANDON, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
