Cases 31 - 40 of 257
READER v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
RICHARD READER
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ABBIE TATE, JAMES ECKARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
THIVENER v. NERO, ET AL
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THIVENER
Defendant:
ANDREW NERO, PETER LARGEY, THOMAS NICKLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TITCHENELL v. GREENE COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Defendant:
ROBERT J. RHODES, GREENE COUNTY, JEFF RHODES and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY D. TITCHENELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ARGENTINA v. HAZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ARGENTINA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY HAZEL, WAYNE FARGOTSTEIN, RICHARD SNIPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEAN v. BIGHAM et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Defendant:
DAVID BIGHAM, DAVID BERG, ERIC ANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
