Cases 41 - 50 of 471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
INGRAM v. DUNBAR et al
as 2:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
MARCEL NICOLE INGRAM
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE GEORGE DUNBAR, THE HONORABLE ERIC DAVANZO, JACOB SMELTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. VA POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEIGH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
VA POLICE, OFFICER AARON MINOR, PAUL "DOE" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ZABRZESKI v. BOROUGH
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ZABRZESKI and KAREN ZABRZESKI
Defendant:
LORETTO BOROUGH, DAVID J. ECKENRODE, WARD PROSTEJOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
KRAEMER et al v. ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
WENDI KRAEMER and ANGELS JOURNEY HOME RESCUE
Defendant:
ROSTRAVER TOWNSHIP, GARY N. BECK, SR., FRANK MONACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
