Cases 1 - 10 of 25
RUDOLPH et al v. INTEGRITY CONSTRUCTION AND WINDOWS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT RUDOLPH and DAN COOK
Defendant:
INTEGRITY CONSTRUCTION AND WINDOWS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rudolph et al v. , Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc.,
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Elliot Rudolph and Dan Cook
Defendant:
, Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rudolph et al v. , Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook and Elliot Rudolph
Defendant:
, Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. BURGER et al
as 2:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Defendant:
ZACHARY BURGER, DANA NOWALK, JAMIE COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PRICE v. NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv01274
Defendant:
OFFICER RICHARD CONTI, NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARK MANOS and others
Plaintiff:
JAYLA PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRINGTON v. UPMC et al
as 2:2020cv00497
Plaintiff:
CHERELL HARRINGTON and DESERAE COOK
Defendant:
UPMC and ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
