Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SMITH v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
TROOPER ADAM ROBERTS, TROOPER BRIAN ROBERTS, TROOPER CHADWICK ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PHILLIPS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PHILLIPS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARR v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE HARR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, JOHN DOES 1-10, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2020cv01952
Defendant:
WILEY PERIODICALS, INC., UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, MARK GLADWIN and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PETERSON v. OPRENDEK et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. PETERSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY C. OPRENDEK, BENJAMIN E. ZIMMER, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
MONTAGUE WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, MANKE, MCWILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORENO et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
GEORGEIA MORENO , DARLENE STAYMATES and MARK STAYMATES
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MICHAEL REDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GILLON v. SOUTHWEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01592
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ANTHONY GILLON, III
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
