Cases 11 - 20 of 133
PROCTOR v. DIALESANDRO et al
as 2:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor
Defendant:
MARK DIALESANDRO, John Stabiel, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
SHELDON LEE MORRIS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (DOC), M. ZAKEN, S. MCCRACKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JENNIFER ANNE PETERSON-BUCK, LINDA H. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01957
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT DETWILER, INMATE ACCOUNTS SUPERVISOR, LIEUTENANT H. VEIHDOFFER and others
Plaintiff:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. USA
as 2:2020cv01002
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TRIPATI v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
KRISTIN WHITNEY BASHA, LUCY M. RAUD, NICHOLAS D. ALEDO and others
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
