Cases 11 - 20 of 115
LEWIS v. DARR et al
as 2:2022cv01661
Plaintiff:
TONY SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
M. DARR, M. ZAKEN, J. SEIBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
TONY SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
M. ZAKEN, M. DARR, J. SEIBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
TONY SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOLLOWOOD, SERGEANT KOPELIC, LT HINTMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RANSOME v. LONGSTRETH et al
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH RANSOME
Defendant:
STEVEN LONGSTRETH, MS. SHETKA, T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRADLEY v. SAYRE et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEWIS BRADLEY, JR.
Defendant:
HERMAN AVERY SAYRE, JOHN ARMOUR and WILLIAM SHOUPPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 J.E. LEWIS, C/O 1 PAVLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRADLEY v. SHOUPPE
as 2:2021cv01632
Petitioner:
GREGORY LEWIS BRADLEY, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PALUCH v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK LEWIS, MATTHEW KENDERSKI, MICHAEL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
