Cases 21 - 30 of 30
TURNER v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv01855
Plaintiff:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR. , TORY KELLY, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMORE v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
GEORGE GILMORE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, RANDALL E. BRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS v. WOLF et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
WOLF, WHITE, RAYMOND SOBINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON v. BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY et al
as 3:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION'S CFO SUNG YI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLYNN v. SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FLYNN
Defendant:
SCI HOUTZDALE, KNISELY, MORRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv00065
Petitioner:
TERRANCE THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY , SHIRLEY MOORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUDSON v. DASCANI et al
as 2:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
BASH HUDSON
Defendant:
DASCANI , J. F. MAZURKIEWICZ , MOLLURA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTEAGA v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv01528
Petitioner:
GILBERT ARTEAGA
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE, P. LECHNER and others
Defendant:
LAWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOLDEN v. SUPERINTENDENT COLEMAN et al
as 3:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
JEROME GOLDEN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT COLEMAN, KITCHEN SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #4, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
