Cases 31 - 40 of 103
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01556
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL ISTICK and others
Plaintiff:
JULES MARQUIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
NARANJO v. LOWDEN et al
as 2:2017cv01291
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
F. SALVAY, WILLIAM LOWDEN, STALEY R. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2017cv01237
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, WILLIAM TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EAVES v. WALKER et al
as 2:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY EAVES
Defendant:
MR. FRANK WALKER, MONICA CWYNAR, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEKULAR v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Petitioner:
FRANK PEKULAR, JR.
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DELBRIDGE v. LARA et al
as 2:2016cv01455
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. DELBRIDGE
Defendant:
FRANK LARA, DALLAS B. JONES, OSCAR MACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANK v. BAKER
as 2:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
CHARLES REUBEN FRANK
Defendant:
MS. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANK v. PHILLIPAS
as 2:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
CHARLES REUBEN FRANK
Defendant:
PHILLIPAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. USA
as 2:2016cv00882
Petitioner:
FRANK PEREZ, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
