Cases 31 - 40 of 89
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. HRIBAR et al
as 2:2019cv00398
Defendant:
C/O JOHN DOE #2, C/O JOHN DOE #3, C/O STRAIT and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCKEEVER v. SINGAS et al
as 2:2019cv00370
Defendant:
PATRICK DELANEY, STEVEN STADTMILLER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MCKEEVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HILL-JOHNSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HUGHES v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00267
Defendant:
JOHN DOE - 2, JOHN DOE - 3, J. BEACH and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YONKERS v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00946
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NEELY, JOHN DOE #1, WESTMORELAND COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN YONKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARTER v. BAUMCRATZ et al
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
RALPH J. CARTER
Defendant:
ADAM BAUMCRATZ, CODY WRIGHT, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. DOE 1, et al
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, GILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIDES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, COPAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
